<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Georgia DA McDade Should Be Prosecuted for Distribution of Child Pornography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2007/07/georgia-da-mcdade-should-be-prosecuted-for-distribution-of-child-pornography/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2007/07/georgia-da-mcdade-should-be-prosecuted-for-distribution-of-child-pornography</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:39:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yuzukcu</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2007/07/georgia-da-mcdade-should-be-prosecuted-for-distribution-of-child-pornography/comment-page-1#comment-48557</link>
		<dc:creator>Yuzukcu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/?p=2089#comment-48557</guid>
		<description>Well, here&#039;s my two cents...  far as I know, there is a law preventing the defense from even viewing such material, but not the prosecution (well, after Wilson v. State of Georgia, there was).  Further, distributing material that constitutes to child porn is against federal law (again, far as I know) - the claim is that McDade not only gave it to people involved in the case, people-of-the-law, but &#039;members of the public&#039; meaning, there is a video involving sex AMONG minors floating around somewhere, and some guy, some day, may be convicted because of it.  I think if that day ever comes, he should say in his defense, &quot;I got this from David McDade.. well, the guy I got it from did anyway...  and so did the guy he got it from...!&quot;

Further, as to possibly WHY McDade hasn&#039;t gotten the consent of the &quot;victims&quot; (open ended, not suggesting they aren&#039;t, not suggesting they are; no contest on that concept in this context) because, far as he was concerned, since they weren&#039;t &quot;of age&quot;, their consent wasn&#039;t &quot;legal&quot; anyway. 

But what he did, not just with the case with the punishment of 10-years-with-NPP and not using the power he had to set aside the charges intentionally, is to, in effect or in essence, distribute child pornography.  &quot;Prosecutorial ego&quot; (as stated by the ESPN one time) it is, but he has taken it to the level of &quot;prosecutorial ego masturbation&quot;.  How&#039;s THAT for poetic debauchery!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, here&#8217;s my two cents&#8230;  far as I know, there is a law preventing the defense from even viewing such material, but not the prosecution (well, after Wilson v. State of Georgia, there was).  Further, distributing material that constitutes to child porn is against federal law (again, far as I know) &#8211; the claim is that McDade not only gave it to people involved in the case, people-of-the-law, but &#8216;members of the public&#8217; meaning, there is a video involving sex AMONG minors floating around somewhere, and some guy, some day, may be convicted because of it.  I think if that day ever comes, he should say in his defense, &#8220;I got this from David McDade.. well, the guy I got it from did anyway&#8230;  and so did the guy he got it from&#8230;!&#8221;</p>
<p>Further, as to possibly WHY McDade hasn&#8217;t gotten the consent of the &#8220;victims&#8221; (open ended, not suggesting they aren&#8217;t, not suggesting they are; no contest on that concept in this context) because, far as he was concerned, since they weren&#8217;t &#8220;of age&#8221;, their consent wasn&#8217;t &#8220;legal&#8221; anyway. </p>
<p>But what he did, not just with the case with the punishment of 10-years-with-NPP and not using the power he had to set aside the charges intentionally, is to, in effect or in essence, distribute child pornography.  &#8220;Prosecutorial ego&#8221; (as stated by the ESPN one time) it is, but he has taken it to the level of &#8220;prosecutorial ego masturbation&#8221;.  How&#8217;s THAT for poetic debauchery!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2007/07/georgia-da-mcdade-should-be-prosecuted-for-distribution-of-child-pornography/comment-page-1#comment-10986</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 18:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/?p=2089#comment-10986</guid>
		<description>Mr. McDade is an example of how the far right is destroying this country.
The far right doesn&#039;t care about the majority thought process, just how THEY feel.

Jail Mr. McDade for 2 years.   That sounds fair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. McDade is an example of how the far right is destroying this country.<br />
The far right doesn&#8217;t care about the majority thought process, just how THEY feel.</p>
<p>Jail Mr. McDade for 2 years.   That sounds fair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

