<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: U.S. OK&#8217;d Troop Terror Hunts in Pakistan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2007/08/us-okd-troop-terror-hunts-in-pakistan/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2007/08/us-okd-troop-terror-hunts-in-pakistan</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:39:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Convention &#187; Comments From Left Field</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2007/08/us-okd-troop-terror-hunts-in-pakistan/comment-page-1#comment-1925</link>
		<dc:creator>Convention &#187; Comments From Left Field</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 18:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2007/08/us-okd-troop-terror-hunts-in-pakistan#comment-1925</guid>
		<description>[...] in a comment to this post by Mike Tedesco, I touched upon a topic that I think merits a little more attention; the dictates of conventional [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in a comment to this post by Mike Tedesco, I touched upon a topic that I think merits a little more attention; the dictates of conventional [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle E. Moore</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2007/08/us-okd-troop-terror-hunts-in-pakistan/comment-page-1#comment-1904</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle E. Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 09:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2007/08/us-okd-troop-terror-hunts-in-pakistan#comment-1904</guid>
		<description>And there&#039;s a reason why they call it conventional</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And there&#8217;s a reason why they call it conventional</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Tedesco</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2007/08/us-okd-troop-terror-hunts-in-pakistan/comment-page-1#comment-1887</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Tedesco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 01:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2007/08/us-okd-troop-terror-hunts-in-pakistan#comment-1887</guid>
		<description>If the conventional wisdom plays out then yes, sadly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the conventional wisdom plays out then yes, sadly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle E. Moore</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2007/08/us-okd-troop-terror-hunts-in-pakistan/comment-page-1#comment-1884</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle E. Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 01:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2007/08/us-okd-troop-terror-hunts-in-pakistan#comment-1884</guid>
		<description>heh... REad the Gored post.  It&#039;s unlikely.  Here&#039;s how it&#039;s gonna play, pending major shake up; Obama will continue to get Gored, though having a significantly stronger hypothetical General Election showing than Hillary Clinton (because somehow, despite large stacks of data that say differently, the &quot;reality based&quot; community believes Hillary to be more electable).  Hillary will win the nomination and face Rudy or Fred.  Despite significant negatives from either candidate, Hillary&#039;s own net negative, her solidified anti-base, will make the presidential incredibly close to call.  I think Hillary may squeak through, the odds I would think are slightly in her favor, but damn it all, I would like to avoid an ulcer before forty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heh&#8230; REad the Gored post.  It&#8217;s unlikely.  Here&#8217;s how it&#8217;s gonna play, pending major shake up; Obama will continue to get Gored, though having a significantly stronger hypothetical General Election showing than Hillary Clinton (because somehow, despite large stacks of data that say differently, the &#8220;reality based&#8221; community believes Hillary to be more electable).  Hillary will win the nomination and face Rudy or Fred.  Despite significant negatives from either candidate, Hillary&#8217;s own net negative, her solidified anti-base, will make the presidential incredibly close to call.  I think Hillary may squeak through, the odds I would think are slightly in her favor, but damn it all, I would like to avoid an ulcer before forty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

