<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Democratic Debate Final Analysis: All In The Spin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2007/10/democratic-debate-final-analysis-all-in-the-spin/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2007/10/democratic-debate-final-analysis-all-in-the-spin</link>
	<description>Loaning brain cells to those in need since 2003</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: revolving line of credit</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2007/10/democratic-debate-final-analysis-all-in-the-spin#comment-24163</link>
		<dc:creator>revolving line of credit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2007/10/democratic-debate-final-analysis-all-in-the-spin#comment-24163</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;revolving line of credit...&lt;/strong&gt;

bluntly?unadulterated?parts Carson Daniel,...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>revolving line of credit&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>bluntly?unadulterated?parts Carson Daniel,&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micah Rose</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2007/10/democratic-debate-final-analysis-all-in-the-spin#comment-11620</link>
		<dc:creator>Micah Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 07:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2007/10/democratic-debate-final-analysis-all-in-the-spin#comment-11620</guid>
		<description>Al, it seems to me like you missed something here. Hillary Clinton has a history of changing positions whenever it is politically expedient. This type of behavior is not befitting of a Presidential candidate. She was attacked for this, and not folding doesn't mean that she won. Appearing strong and collected does not make you a quality candidate by default. This logic would put Bush after 9-11 in a special category of candidates. If you noticed, there were no attacks based on her feminity, so put that "girl getting beat on by boys" thing up. It makes it sound like you are now rooting for her simply because of her sex. I believe any candidate the dems put forth will bodyslam the republican candidate, but I don't want it to be her. I don't feel like I can trust her to have any guts. What did she do after her health care plan failed? She gave up. She has the most ephemeral plan of any of the frontrunners on health care; there are almost no details. This after a 10 plus year hiatus on the issue.  She has bowed out of her positions whenever it becomes inconvenient to hold them. She did this again in the debate concerning illegal immigrant licensing in New York, and has done it on the Iraq war. I expect her to continue this pattern, as it has been very consistent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Al, it seems to me like you missed something here. Hillary Clinton has a history of changing positions whenever it is politically expedient. This type of behavior is not befitting of a Presidential candidate. She was attacked for this, and not folding doesn&#8217;t mean that she won. Appearing strong and collected does not make you a quality candidate by default. This logic would put Bush after 9-11 in a special category of candidates. If you noticed, there were no attacks based on her feminity, so put that &#8220;girl getting beat on by boys&#8221; thing up. It makes it sound like you are now rooting for her simply because of her sex. I believe any candidate the dems put forth will bodyslam the republican candidate, but I don&#8217;t want it to be her. I don&#8217;t feel like I can trust her to have any guts. What did she do after her health care plan failed? She gave up. She has the most ephemeral plan of any of the frontrunners on health care; there are almost no details. This after a 10 plus year hiatus on the issue.  She has bowed out of her positions whenever it becomes inconvenient to hold them. She did this again in the debate concerning illegal immigrant licensing in New York, and has done it on the Iraq war. I expect her to continue this pattern, as it has been very consistent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: al</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2007/10/democratic-debate-final-analysis-all-in-the-spin#comment-11492</link>
		<dc:creator>al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 23:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2007/10/democratic-debate-final-analysis-all-in-the-spin#comment-11492</guid>
		<description>While Obama and Edwards (the Breck girl) sounded like a pack of whining, yapping dogs, Sen. Clinton held her own, defending her positions with good reasoning, and not losing it, I felt. She looked Presidential. Obama and Edwards looked childish and amateurish, accusing her of the very things they themselves are guilty of. She looked strong, collected, and ready to be president. These other two looked like they need to buy some bubble gum and head to the video arcade, where they can insult girls, because a real woman is too much for them to handle. I was up in the air about this field, but last night, Hill became my gal.
The far left wing of this party, if appeased by the likes of Edwards and Obama will drag this party down to defeat yet AGAIN in 2008.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Obama and Edwards (the Breck girl) sounded like a pack of whining, yapping dogs, Sen. Clinton held her own, defending her positions with good reasoning, and not losing it, I felt. She looked Presidential. Obama and Edwards looked childish and amateurish, accusing her of the very things they themselves are guilty of. She looked strong, collected, and ready to be president. These other two looked like they need to buy some bubble gum and head to the video arcade, where they can insult girls, because a real woman is too much for them to handle. I was up in the air about this field, but last night, Hill became my gal.<br />
The far left wing of this party, if appeased by the likes of Edwards and Obama will drag this party down to defeat yet AGAIN in 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
