Ken; I think it’s possible, but it is also rather difficult to believe that a campaign that was once so strictly disciplined has pretty much had the wheels come off. I know that lately Bill Clinton has gotten a little miffed at how the campaign is being run, andhas in fact injected himself more into it, and get this, Bill wants to go more negative.

What I do know is that Mark Penn, Hillary’s campaign manager, has been running Clinton as an incumbent, but I think what we are seeing is there being a lack of a plan B. It worked great when not too many people were paying attention, but now that people are, more and more folks are picking up on the disparity of the incumbent campaign she is running, and the fact that she’s not an incumbent.

And then you have the Iowa problem in that, Hillary and her apparatus just don’t understand Iowa, compared to both Edwards and Obama who do. From what I’ve been reading, while the big three are in a statistical tie in Iowa, I wouldn’t be overly surprised if Hillary gets left in the dust there.

But change and Hillary Clinton having a record of making change does not compute. CLINTON = BUSINESS AS USUAL (this country cannot afford it.)
OBAMA or EDWARDS = REAL CHANGE. The choice is simple. No more debates needed. No more stupid comments by stupid politicians and over the top news media in need of a wagon to jump on.