<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;The Handmaid&#8217;s Tale Revisited&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/01/the-handmaids-tale-revisited/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/01/the-handmaids-tale-revisited</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 10:28:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: D Metzger</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/01/the-handmaids-tale-revisited/comment-page-1#comment-19128</link>
		<dc:creator>D Metzger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 07:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/01/the-handmaids-tale-revisited#comment-19128</guid>
		<description>Look: just because you&#039;ve got a problem with the idea of &quot;wombs for rent&quot; doesn&#039;t make it a bad thing.  The issue here isn&#039;t paid surrogacy, it&#039;s if these woman are getting a fair trade for their troubles.  

Arguably they&#039;re not, but that doesn&#039;t make the concept of &lt;strong&gt;infertile&lt;/strong&gt; couples paying someone else to go through a pregnancy for them invalid.  It simply makes it, at this time, exploitive.  

Got any other &quot;class war&quot; buzzwords to add to the post?  You had me until then; but then maybe I&#039;m not liberal enough for your brand of liberal...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look: just because you&#8217;ve got a problem with the idea of &#8220;wombs for rent&#8221; doesn&#8217;t make it a bad thing.  The issue here isn&#8217;t paid surrogacy, it&#8217;s if these woman are getting a fair trade for their troubles.  </p>
<p>Arguably they&#8217;re not, but that doesn&#8217;t make the concept of <strong>infertile</strong> couples paying someone else to go through a pregnancy for them invalid.  It simply makes it, at this time, exploitive.  </p>
<p>Got any other &#8220;class war&#8221; buzzwords to add to the post?  You had me until then; but then maybe I&#8217;m not liberal enough for your brand of liberal&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

