Comments on: Tenacious “C” http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/03/tenacious-c Loaning brain cells to those in need since 2003 Wed, 19 Nov 2008 22:20:15 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: xranger http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/03/tenacious-c#comment-25140 xranger Wed, 05 Mar 2008 13:55:53 +0000 http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/03/tenacious-c#comment-25140 Looks like Obama's wave has crested. Looks like Obama’s wave has crested.

]]> By: Barack Obama 2008 - The Morning After…again : positivelyBarack.com http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/03/tenacious-c#comment-25136 Barack Obama 2008 - The Morning After…again : positivelyBarack.com Wed, 05 Mar 2008 13:36:50 +0000 http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/03/tenacious-c#comment-25136 [...] Tenacious “C” via Comments From Left Field Say it with me, three more months, three more months, three more months… SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: "The Morning After...again", url: "http://www.positivelybarack.com/2008/03/05/the-morning-afteragain/" }); [...] [...] Tenacious “C” via Comments From Left Field Say it with me, three more months, three more months, three more months… SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: “The Morning After…again”, url: “http://www.positivelybarack.com/2008/03/05/the-morning-afteragain/” }); [...]

]]> By: Ty http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/03/tenacious-c#comment-25111 Ty Wed, 05 Mar 2008 07:19:30 +0000 http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/03/tenacious-c#comment-25111 Yup, significant lead in OH. The TX numbers might be misleading because of their convoluted vote & caucus system. Overall a good night for the Hill Yup, significant lead in OH. The TX numbers might be misleading because of their convoluted vote & caucus system. Overall a good night for the Hill

]]> By: Dynamic http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/03/tenacious-c#comment-25110 Dynamic Wed, 05 Mar 2008 06:34:26 +0000 http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/03/tenacious-c#comment-25110 Argh I am so sick of this crap! :lol: I think you called it aright with your analysis of how important her media advantage this last bit has been - it's been nonstop coverage. Tack on that stupid Canadian flap and she managed to net a big number of the late deciders. I wonder if anyonebothered to point out to them that she mathematically still can't win. Argh I am so sick of this crap! :lol:

I think you called it aright with your analysis of how important her media advantage this last bit has been - it’s been nonstop coverage. Tack on that stupid Canadian flap and she managed to net a big number of the late deciders.

I wonder if anyonebothered to point out to them that she mathematically still can’t win.

]]>