<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Lynching</title>
	<atom:link href="http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/03/the-lynching/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/03/the-lynching</link>
	<description>Loaning brain cells to those in need since 2003</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Real Reason Wright Won&#8217;t Go Away &#124; Comments from Left Field</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/03/the-lynching#comment-33068</link>
		<dc:creator>The Real Reason Wright Won&#8217;t Go Away &#124; Comments from Left Field</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/03/the-lynching#comment-33068</guid>
		<description>[...] of those notorious clips were put back into contest, I described the media circus that preceded the re-contextualization as a lynching, because that&#8217;s exactly what it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of those notorious clips were put back into contest, I described the media circus that preceded the re-contextualization as a lynching, because that&#8217;s exactly what it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy Noe</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/03/the-lynching#comment-27882</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Noe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 10:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/03/the-lynching#comment-27882</guid>
		<description>Thank you for setting the record straight!  I saw the longer 9/11 sermon on UTube a couple days ago and learned that the statements had been taken out of context - he was paraphrasing what Ambassador Peck said on Fox news!  What your transcript fails to include is the deliberate way in which Rev Wright bracketed that part of his sermon as a "faith footnote" so that the congregation would know that he was paraphrasing Ambassador Peck.  Once he finished with that part of the sermon ("end footnote"), he went on to deliver a very different message about what he felt God wanted him, and us, to do in response to this attack - at a time when everyone else was talking about revenge.  And it was inspiring. I was irritated that the sermon was cut off, because I wanted to hear the rest of it, and the two other points that he made that day.   

The longer UTube version of the "God Damn America" sermon only gives the context leading up to the inflammatory remarks, and doesn't go beyond that point, so it is pretty hard to know where Rev Wright took that message from there.   But certainly the sermon fits within the context of the prophetic preaching style that Rev Wright and others use. There is a good article by Jane Lampman in the Christian Science Monitor about Rev Wright, and the role black preachers have played in America, here: 

http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0328/p03s07-ussc.html?page=1

Another CSM article from July 2007 about Barack Obama and his faith is also very interesting:  http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0716/p01s01-uspo.html

I sent a note to CNN suggesting that they get the full version from the church and post it on their video area, and say something about it, and the fact that Rev Wright's comments had been taken out of context.  I also told them I thought that CNN, ABC and Fox news and others have participated in a smear campaign and should take action to rehabilitate Rev Wright's reputation.   So far, I don't think they have done anything - perhaps not wanting to inflame the situation further.   But since it doesn't seem to be going away... I think they should "flesh out" the story and not just keep fanning the sparks into flames.  It could go a long ways in supporting an important conversation.   But it needs to be lifted out of the current campaign politics where any discussion devolves into what impact it will have on the election.  The issues raised as a result of the Rev Wright controversy and Barack Obama's response (and there are many) transcend the election, and should be handled in a serious manner, and involve the participation of people other than political pundits.  I could suggest a few luminaries who might have some cogent comments to make on a number of the issues, but the list is too long.   Perhaps it is too much to ask of cable entertainment/news network to provide the venue for such discourse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for setting the record straight!  I saw the longer 9/11 sermon on UTube a couple days ago and learned that the statements had been taken out of context - he was paraphrasing what Ambassador Peck said on Fox news!  What your transcript fails to include is the deliberate way in which Rev Wright bracketed that part of his sermon as a &#8220;faith footnote&#8221; so that the congregation would know that he was paraphrasing Ambassador Peck.  Once he finished with that part of the sermon (&#8221;end footnote&#8221;), he went on to deliver a very different message about what he felt God wanted him, and us, to do in response to this attack - at a time when everyone else was talking about revenge.  And it was inspiring. I was irritated that the sermon was cut off, because I wanted to hear the rest of it, and the two other points that he made that day.   </p>
<p>The longer UTube version of the &#8220;God Damn America&#8221; sermon only gives the context leading up to the inflammatory remarks, and doesn&#8217;t go beyond that point, so it is pretty hard to know where Rev Wright took that message from there.   But certainly the sermon fits within the context of the prophetic preaching style that Rev Wright and others use. There is a good article by Jane Lampman in the Christian Science Monitor about Rev Wright, and the role black preachers have played in America, here: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0328/p03s07-ussc.html?page=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0328/p03s07-ussc.html?page=1</a></p>
<p>Another CSM article from July 2007 about Barack Obama and his faith is also very interesting:  <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0716/p01s01-uspo.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0716/p01s01-uspo.html</a></p>
<p>I sent a note to CNN suggesting that they get the full version from the church and post it on their video area, and say something about it, and the fact that Rev Wright&#8217;s comments had been taken out of context.  I also told them I thought that CNN, ABC and Fox news and others have participated in a smear campaign and should take action to rehabilitate Rev Wright&#8217;s reputation.   So far, I don&#8217;t think they have done anything - perhaps not wanting to inflame the situation further.   But since it doesn&#8217;t seem to be going away&#8230; I think they should &#8220;flesh out&#8221; the story and not just keep fanning the sparks into flames.  It could go a long ways in supporting an important conversation.   But it needs to be lifted out of the current campaign politics where any discussion devolves into what impact it will have on the election.  The issues raised as a result of the Rev Wright controversy and Barack Obama&#8217;s response (and there are many) transcend the election, and should be handled in a serious manner, and involve the participation of people other than political pundits.  I could suggest a few luminaries who might have some cogent comments to make on a number of the issues, but the list is too long.   Perhaps it is too much to ask of cable entertainment/news network to provide the venue for such discourse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle E. Moore</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/03/the-lynching#comment-27425</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle E. Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 23:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/03/the-lynching#comment-27425</guid>
		<description>I really want to watch this, unfortunately the earliest I'm going to get a chance to will be at like 2 in the morning... sigh.

I had a pretty long conversation about this with a friend, and the general opinion at this point is that this was a damn hard hit job, whomever is ultimately responsible remains to be seen, and for now, it's best to let the whole thing die until it comes back during the General Election.

As for why we all bought it hook line and sinker, I take a different tack, though you do have a point.  My thoughts are that this thing just came on so hard and fast that we all just kinda got shocked straight into damage control  We've all heard whispers, of course, but in the end a lot of us got really blindsided and found ourselves so scared of being associated with Rev. Wright's comments that we went into distancing mode without even thinking about maybe he was taken out of context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really want to watch this, unfortunately the earliest I&#8217;m going to get a chance to will be at like 2 in the morning&#8230; sigh.</p>
<p>I had a pretty long conversation about this with a friend, and the general opinion at this point is that this was a damn hard hit job, whomever is ultimately responsible remains to be seen, and for now, it&#8217;s best to let the whole thing die until it comes back during the General Election.</p>
<p>As for why we all bought it hook line and sinker, I take a different tack, though you do have a point.  My thoughts are that this thing just came on so hard and fast that we all just kinda got shocked straight into damage control  We&#8217;ve all heard whispers, of course, but in the end a lot of us got really blindsided and found ourselves so scared of being associated with Rev. Wright&#8217;s comments that we went into distancing mode without even thinking about maybe he was taken out of context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrGail</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/03/the-lynching#comment-27409</link>
		<dc:creator>DrGail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 22:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/03/the-lynching#comment-27409</guid>
		<description>I just watched the youtube Betsy was kind enough to link.  

Expressions of religion in general -- and sermons in particular -- tend to leave me cold.  But I thought he made some very sound points that, to a religious person, would be thought-provoking.  I found nothing shocking or distressing about it, although I was concerned about potential IRS investigations of the church's tax-exempt status, particularly if this sermon was delivered prior to the 2004 election.

The context truly makes all the difference, although I didn't find the "God damn America" statement to be egregious even in the carefully-selected excerpt so maybe I'm not the best person to weigh in on this matter.


I can certainly appreciate Kyle's inclination toward self-flagellation upon recognizing that we "failed to get Wright's back".  Perhaps it isn't so much that we fell prey to the right-wing frame and extreme outrage, but simply that many of us have little notion about what goes on in predominantly-black churches?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just watched the youtube Betsy was kind enough to link.  </p>
<p>Expressions of religion in general &#8212; and sermons in particular &#8212; tend to leave me cold.  But I thought he made some very sound points that, to a religious person, would be thought-provoking.  I found nothing shocking or distressing about it, although I was concerned about potential IRS investigations of the church&#8217;s tax-exempt status, particularly if this sermon was delivered prior to the 2004 election.</p>
<p>The context truly makes all the difference, although I didn&#8217;t find the &#8220;God damn America&#8221; statement to be egregious even in the carefully-selected excerpt so maybe I&#8217;m not the best person to weigh in on this matter.</p>
<p>I can certainly appreciate Kyle&#8217;s inclination toward self-flagellation upon recognizing that we &#8220;failed to get Wright&#8217;s back&#8221;.  Perhaps it isn&#8217;t so much that we fell prey to the right-wing frame and extreme outrage, but simply that many of us have little notion about what goes on in predominantly-black churches?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle E. Moore</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/03/the-lynching#comment-27389</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle E. Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 19:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/03/the-lynching#comment-27389</guid>
		<description>Thank you Betsy.  I was hoping to find that...  I can't look at it right now, but I intend to when I get home.

Incidentally, if there are any other Left Fieldians, or Cuffaluffs out there who can watch this, I would really love to get some opinions on this before I do get the chance to watch.

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Betsy.  I was hoping to find that&#8230;  I can&#8217;t look at it right now, but I intend to when I get home.</p>
<p>Incidentally, if there are any other Left Fieldians, or Cuffaluffs out there who can watch this, I would really love to get some opinions on this before I do get the chance to watch.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Betsy</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/03/the-lynching#comment-27385</link>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 19:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/03/the-lynching#comment-27385</guid>
		<description>-

Things take a slightly different perspective when viewed in the right context.

Whether one agrees with Reverend Wright or not, it seems to me that he has been unfairly demonized to make a media controversy. 


Jeremiah Wright's God Damn America in context on Youtube

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RvMbeVQj6Lw</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>-</p>
<p>Things take a slightly different perspective when viewed in the right context.</p>
<p>Whether one agrees with Reverend Wright or not, it seems to me that he has been unfairly demonized to make a media controversy. </p>
<p>Jeremiah Wright&#8217;s God Damn America in context on Youtube</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RvMbeVQj6Lw" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RvMbeVQj6Lw</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xranger</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/03/the-lynching#comment-27370</link>
		<dc:creator>xranger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/03/the-lynching#comment-27370</guid>
		<description>Well, here's how it really started, not by Fox News:

"The fracas started Thursday morning, when ABC’s “Good Morning America” ran a Brian Ross expose on Wright that included old video of him saying: “The government gives them the drugs, builds bigger prisons, passes a three-strike law and then wants us to sing ‘God bless America’? No, no, no. Not God bless America. God [expletive] America.” "

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0308/9051.html

Good to see you're up on the latest kook spin, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, here&#8217;s how it really started, not by Fox News:</p>
<p>&#8220;The fracas started Thursday morning, when ABC’s “Good Morning America” ran a Brian Ross expose on Wright that included old video of him saying: “The government gives them the drugs, builds bigger prisons, passes a three-strike law and then wants us to sing ‘God bless America’? No, no, no. Not God bless America. God [expletive] America.” &#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0308/9051.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0308/9051.html</a></p>
<p>Good to see you&#8217;re up on the latest kook spin, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
