<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When Did She Cross The Threshold?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/03/when-did-she-cross-the-threshold/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/03/when-did-she-cross-the-threshold</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:11:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kyle E. Moore</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/03/when-did-she-cross-the-threshold/comment-page-1#comment-25281</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle E. Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 14:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/03/when-did-she-cross-the-threshold#comment-25281</guid>
		<description>Thanks Ann, after I get done with what I&#039;m writing now, I&#039;m going to look into this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Ann, after I get done with what I&#8217;m writing now, I&#8217;m going to look into this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann Moore</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/03/when-did-she-cross-the-threshold/comment-page-1#comment-25278</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 14:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/03/when-did-she-cross-the-threshold#comment-25278</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your commentary, you make a very valid point. 
Something else that needs exposing is the details of the NAFTA memo. Canadian newspapers are running articles asking for an official apology to Sen. Obama.
Seems as though Clinton lied by saying she had nothing to do with or knew about a &quot;memo&quot; concerning NAFTA, when in reality she sent the memo to the Canadians and their news service &quot;got it wrong&quot; and said it was Obama.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080306.wnafta07/BNStory/National/home</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your commentary, you make a very valid point.<br />
Something else that needs exposing is the details of the NAFTA memo. Canadian newspapers are running articles asking for an official apology to Sen. Obama.<br />
Seems as though Clinton lied by saying she had nothing to do with or knew about a &#8220;memo&#8221; concerning NAFTA, when in reality she sent the memo to the Canadians and their news service &#8220;got it wrong&#8221; and said it was Obama.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080306.wnafta07/BNStory/National/home" rel="nofollow">http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080306.wnafta07/BNStory/National/home</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle E. Moore</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/03/when-did-she-cross-the-threshold/comment-page-1#comment-25277</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle E. Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 13:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/03/when-did-she-cross-the-threshold#comment-25277</guid>
		<description>I agree.  This idea that she&#039;s been fully vetted is ridiculous, and as I was telling Mr. Tedesco last night, she&#039;s paralyzed the media into not reporting against her.

But if she insists she&#039;s vetted, let&#039;s see how that is. Thanks for the tip on IPA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  This idea that she&#8217;s been fully vetted is ridiculous, and as I was telling Mr. Tedesco last night, she&#8217;s paralyzed the media into not reporting against her.</p>
<p>But if she insists she&#8217;s vetted, let&#8217;s see how that is. Thanks for the tip on IPA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angellight</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/03/when-did-she-cross-the-threshold/comment-page-1#comment-25267</link>
		<dc:creator>Angellight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 07:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/03/when-did-she-cross-the-threshold#comment-25267</guid>
		<description>Obama Returned Rezko Money Why Won&#039;t Hillary Return Money to IPA Company acused of sexually harrasing women?
 
Sen. Hillary Clinton has declined to return $170,000 in campaign contributions from individuals at a company accused of widespread sexual harassment, and whose CEO is a disbarred lawyer with a criminal record, federal campaign records show.
The federal government has accused the Illinois management consulting firm, International Profit Associates, or IPA, of a brazen pattern of sexual harassment including &quot;sexual assaults,&quot; &quot;degrading anti-female language&quot; and &quot;obscene suggestions.&quot; 
In a 2001 lawsuit full of lurid details, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission claims that 103 women employees at IPA were victimized for years. The civil case is ongoing, and IPA vigorously denies the allegations.
 
&quot;This is by far, hands down, the worst case I&#039;ve ever experienced,&quot; said Diane Smason, one of the EEOC lawyers handling the lawsuit. &quot;Every woman there experienced sex harassment, they were part of a hostile work environment of sex harassment. And this occurred from the top down.&quot;
 
Sen. Clinton&#039;s spokesman, Howard Wolfson, told NBC News in a statement that the senator decided to keep the funds because the lawsuit is &quot;ongoing&quot; and because none of the sexual harassment allegations has been proven in court. 
&quot;With regard to the pending harassment suit, as a general matter, the campaign assesses findings of fact in deciding whether to return contributions,&quot; Wolfson said.
From NBC&#039;s Lisa Myers and Jim Popkin
 
This Country must stand for something.  We cannot let anyone take our Democracy from us be it the Clintons or anyone else.  They must follow the Rules and not change game in middle.  They know this.  They cannot be allowed to Cheat the System for their own aggrandisement.  

As for her superior foreign experience, Hillary did not think it important enough to read the National Intelligence Report and she voted Yes on a Stupid War/Mistate instead of having the intelligence and Judgment to say No, as other Senators did, and stated at the time, we must not invade Iraq who did not bomb us on 911 but instead finish the job in Afghanistan.  This makes her qualifying inelligible for the top job as commander-in-chief.  Just because she surronds herself with a bunch of generals does not make her qualified or anyone else. They love to stage phony events for the perception to make us think something that is not,  is.  Masters of Spin &amp; Hype!

Those of us who care for our Democracy must begin to call CNN, MSNBC, NBC, etc. and ask them to begin to Vet Hillary Clinton and ask the questions they should be asking like why she has not returned the money back to IPA, and about their Camp contacting Canda first in the Naftagate controvery, and to stop the unfair and uneven reporting of just Obama.  It is an illusion that the press has been soft on her.  They as you know are the Masters of Spin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama Returned Rezko Money Why Won&#8217;t Hillary Return Money to IPA Company acused of sexually harrasing women?</p>
<p>Sen. Hillary Clinton has declined to return $170,000 in campaign contributions from individuals at a company accused of widespread sexual harassment, and whose CEO is a disbarred lawyer with a criminal record, federal campaign records show.<br />
The federal government has accused the Illinois management consulting firm, International Profit Associates, or IPA, of a brazen pattern of sexual harassment including &#8220;sexual assaults,&#8221; &#8220;degrading anti-female language&#8221; and &#8220;obscene suggestions.&#8221;<br />
In a 2001 lawsuit full of lurid details, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission claims that 103 women employees at IPA were victimized for years. The civil case is ongoing, and IPA vigorously denies the allegations.</p>
<p>&#8220;This is by far, hands down, the worst case I&#8217;ve ever experienced,&#8221; said Diane Smason, one of the EEOC lawyers handling the lawsuit. &#8220;Every woman there experienced sex harassment, they were part of a hostile work environment of sex harassment. And this occurred from the top down.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sen. Clinton&#8217;s spokesman, Howard Wolfson, told NBC News in a statement that the senator decided to keep the funds because the lawsuit is &#8220;ongoing&#8221; and because none of the sexual harassment allegations has been proven in court.<br />
&#8220;With regard to the pending harassment suit, as a general matter, the campaign assesses findings of fact in deciding whether to return contributions,&#8221; Wolfson said.<br />
From NBC&#8217;s Lisa Myers and Jim Popkin</p>
<p>This Country must stand for something.  We cannot let anyone take our Democracy from us be it the Clintons or anyone else.  They must follow the Rules and not change game in middle.  They know this.  They cannot be allowed to Cheat the System for their own aggrandisement.  </p>
<p>As for her superior foreign experience, Hillary did not think it important enough to read the National Intelligence Report and she voted Yes on a Stupid War/Mistate instead of having the intelligence and Judgment to say No, as other Senators did, and stated at the time, we must not invade Iraq who did not bomb us on 911 but instead finish the job in Afghanistan.  This makes her qualifying inelligible for the top job as commander-in-chief.  Just because she surronds herself with a bunch of generals does not make her qualified or anyone else. They love to stage phony events for the perception to make us think something that is not,  is.  Masters of Spin &amp; Hype!</p>
<p>Those of us who care for our Democracy must begin to call CNN, MSNBC, NBC, etc. and ask them to begin to Vet Hillary Clinton and ask the questions they should be asking like why she has not returned the money back to IPA, and about their Camp contacting Canda first in the Naftagate controvery, and to stop the unfair and uneven reporting of just Obama.  It is an illusion that the press has been soft on her.  They as you know are the Masters of Spin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
