Comments on: In Bushworld, Betrayal Is Okay for Thee, Not for We http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/05/in-bushworld-betrayal-is-okay-for-thee-not-for-we Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:39:52 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 By: thee bush league http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/05/in-bushworld-betrayal-is-okay-for-thee-not-for-we/comment-page-1#comment-37795 thee bush league Wed, 04 Jun 2008 04:32:10 +0000 http://commentsfromleftfield.com/?p=4270#comment-37795 [...] House ?? from current press .... The Conversation, The League, The Pennsylvania Progressive ...http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/05/in-bushworld-betrayal-is-okay-for-thee-not-for-weBush league - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaBush league is a general term used to describe an [...] [...] House ?? from current press …. The Conversation, The League, The Pennsylvania Progressive …http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/05/in-bushworld-betrayal-is-okay-for-thee-not-for-weBush league – Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaBush league is a general term used to describe an [...]

]]> By: imagine service group http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/05/in-bushworld-betrayal-is-okay-for-thee-not-for-we/comment-page-1#comment-37675 imagine service group Mon, 02 Jun 2008 03:33:50 +0000 http://commentsfromleftfield.com/?p=4270#comment-37675 [...] Bob Dole yesterday sent a scalding e-mail to Scott McClellan, excoriating the former White Hohttp://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/05/in-bushworld-betrayal-is-okay-for-thee-not-for-weIt's been a journey for Indian dancer Billings GazetteSHANGHAI, China - For a guy who still bears [...] [...] Bob Dole yesterday sent a scalding e-mail to Scott McClellan, excoriating the former White Hohttp://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/05/in-bushworld-betrayal-is-okay-for-thee-not-for-weIt’s been a journey for Indian dancer Billings GazetteSHANGHAI, China – For a guy who still bears [...]

]]> By: gcotharn http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/05/in-bushworld-betrayal-is-okay-for-thee-not-for-we/comment-page-1#comment-37634 gcotharn Sun, 01 Jun 2008 05:03:44 +0000 http://commentsfromleftfield.com/?p=4270#comment-37634 I agree with you here. Forget the attacks on McClellan. Focus on any charges McClellan made. Respond to those. Logically show why they are incorrect or scurrilous. Now, my suspicion would be that the White House has no effective response to McClellan charges. However, I don't see what McClellan has charged which is damaging. I agree with you here. Forget the attacks on McClellan. Focus on any charges McClellan made. Respond to those. Logically show why they are incorrect or scurrilous.

Now, my suspicion would be that the White House has no effective response to McClellan charges. However, I don’t see what McClellan has charged which is damaging.

]]>