Comments on: You Keep Using That Word… http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/05/you-keep-using-that-word%e2%80%a6 Loaning brain cells to those in need since 2003 Fri, 05 Dec 2008 07:23:11 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: matttbastard http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/05/you-keep-using-that-word%e2%80%a6#comment-36571 matttbastard Sun, 18 May 2008 19:55:31 +0000 http://commentsfromleftfield.com/?p=4179#comment-36571 <blockquote>So, CG, you’re saying that the way to defeat Al Qaeda is to “out fascist” the “fascists”?</blockquote> Actually, he's saying the way to defeat AQ is to "out <i>facist</i>[sic[" the "<i>facists</i>."[sic] Otherwise, what Doc said. ;)

So, CG, you’re saying that the way to defeat Al Qaeda is to “out fascist” the “fascists”?

Actually, he’s saying the way to defeat AQ is to “out facist[sic[" the "facists."[sic]

Otherwise, what Doc said. ;)

]]> By: DrGail http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/05/you-keep-using-that-word%e2%80%a6#comment-36565 DrGail Sun, 18 May 2008 19:09:51 +0000 http://commentsfromleftfield.com/?p=4179#comment-36565 So, CG, you're saying that the way to defeat Al Qaeda is to "out fascist" the "fascists"? I can understand the appeal of that since, after all, the Crusades went sooooo well. But I have a question for you: If we let Al Qaeda draw us into a pissing contest about which religion can be the most zealous and fascist, doesn't that mean that they win? So, CG, you’re saying that the way to defeat Al Qaeda is to “out fascist” the “fascists”? I can understand the appeal of that since, after all, the Crusades went sooooo well. But I have a question for you: If we let Al Qaeda draw us into a pissing contest about which religion can be the most zealous and fascist, doesn’t that mean that they win?

]]> By: matttbastard http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/05/you-keep-using-that-word%e2%80%a6#comment-36563 matttbastard Sun, 18 May 2008 18:55:15 +0000 http://commentsfromleftfield.com/?p=4179#comment-36563 What is it with this site and its attractiveness to the lowest common denominator of grammatically (and factually) challenged wingnut trolls? Seriously, if someone out there with the power to do <i>something</i> about this problem is reading: please, for the love of Holy fucking God, send out some smarter flying monkeys. Or, at the <i>very</i> least, update their script (hint: it's no longer 2002). What is it with this site and its attractiveness to the lowest common denominator of grammatically (and factually) challenged wingnut trolls? Seriously, if someone out there with the power to do something about this problem is reading: please, for the love of Holy fucking God, send out some smarter flying monkeys. Or, at the very least, update their script (hint: it’s no longer 2002).

]]> By: Charles Glasgow http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/05/you-keep-using-that-word%e2%80%a6#comment-36558 Charles Glasgow Sun, 18 May 2008 17:20:29 +0000 http://commentsfromleftfield.com/?p=4179#comment-36558 On this Issue, what is good for the goose is good for the gander. As an American citizen who knows full well the influence George Washington had on the troops with his faith, George Bush has similar interests. Al Queada doesn't play by the rules set up by our founding fathers. They have their own rule book. Should we decide that a state of imbalance is the way to go in fighting the war on terrorism, we will have ourselves to blame when Shria law outmodes the law of the Jewish law of Yaweh and the message of Jesus Christ given to us to replace all other messages to assure peace in our time or any time. We are at a precipice in the realization that if we as a nation goof this up, there is to be no returning to American life as we know it. Forever living in fear of every foreign national that even remotely looks like an Arab or Persian. Iran has a foundation of Moslem brotherhood depicted by their current President who has combined the academic bias in living with a faith. He has no barriers to his practices unlike an American President who must jump through hoops just to prove he is not the religious zealot Amadinajad is. How can we fight a war with parity if we can't play by the same rules that the enemy does. With our knowhow and our ability to adapt, America would do well to abandon our fear of change and meet the Islamic FACIST style with our own Christian FACIST style. Facism being the common denominator. On this Issue, what is good for the goose is good for the gander. As an American citizen who knows full well the influence George Washington had on the troops with his faith, George Bush has similar interests. Al Queada doesn’t play by the rules set up by our founding fathers. They have their own rule book. Should we decide that a state of imbalance is the way to go in fighting the war on terrorism, we will have ourselves to blame when Shria law outmodes the law of the Jewish law of Yaweh and the message of Jesus Christ given to us to replace all other messages to assure peace in our time or any time. We are at a precipice in the realization that if we as a nation goof this up, there is to be no returning to American life as we know it. Forever living in fear of every foreign national that even remotely looks like an Arab or Persian. Iran has a foundation of Moslem brotherhood depicted by their current President who has combined the academic bias in living with a faith. He has no barriers to his practices unlike an American President who must jump through hoops just to prove he is not the religious zealot Amadinajad is. How can we fight a war with parity if we can’t play by the same rules that the enemy does. With our knowhow and our ability to adapt, America would do well to abandon our fear of change and meet the Islamic
FACIST style with our own Christian FACIST style. Facism being the common denominator.

]]>