<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Five Minutes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/06/five-minutes/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/06/five-minutes</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 10:28:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PoliGazette &#187; The AP Overdoes Greed A Tiny Bit</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/06/five-minutes/comment-page-1#comment-38462</link>
		<dc:creator>PoliGazette &#187; The AP Overdoes Greed A Tiny Bit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/?p=4431#comment-38462</guid>
		<description>[...] Kyle E. Moore:  Five minutes is about how long I had to wait for a story covered by the AP to be covered by someone else so I could write on it and not break my AP boycott.   Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kyle E. Moore:  Five minutes is about how long I had to wait for a story covered by the AP to be covered by someone else so I could write on it and not break my AP boycott.   Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Associated Press (AP) Versus The Blogosphere Proves Bloggers Are Winning The Battle For The Title Of &#8220;The Press&#8221; Our Founders Risked Their Lives To Protect &#124; THE GUN TOTING LIBERAL™</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/06/five-minutes/comment-page-1#comment-38458</link>
		<dc:creator>The Associated Press (AP) Versus The Blogosphere Proves Bloggers Are Winning The Battle For The Title Of &#8220;The Press&#8221; Our Founders Risked Their Lives To Protect &#124; THE GUN TOTING LIBERAL™</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 05:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/?p=4431#comment-38458</guid>
		<description>[...] and that&#8217;s sayin&#8217; somethin&#8217;); Donklephant; Little Green Footballs; Hot Air; Comments From Left Field; The Impolitic (Libby Spencer); The Moderate Voice; Firedoglake; Ace Of Spades HQ (Amen!); Q and O [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and that&#8217;s sayin&#8217; somethin&#8217;); Donklephant; Little Green Footballs; Hot Air; Comments From Left Field; The Impolitic (Libby Spencer); The Moderate Voice; Firedoglake; Ace Of Spades HQ (Amen!); Q and O [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/06/five-minutes/comment-page-1#comment-38453</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 02:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/?p=4431#comment-38453</guid>
		<description>What the AP is doing here is beyond idiotic.  It&#039;s pretty clear that it&#039;s being run by people who have no concept of how the internets and new media work.  In a way, I&#039;m sure they&#039;re happy about the &quot;boycott,&quot; since it is giving them exactly what they wanted.  What they don&#039;t realize is that what they wanted will hurt them a heckuva lot more than it will help them, something that the blogosphere clearly realizes.  

And you&#039;re right - it only takes about five minute for some other source to put up an AP story.  Assuming that source actually paid for the rights to the story (which is true if the source is any &quot;old media&quot; site), then the AP has no control whatsoever over what happens to the material once it&#039;s placed on that source&#039;s website.  Which means that the effect of the AP&#039;s policy is just to ensure reduced traffic to its site and greater traffic to secondary party sites, thereby decreasing their own revenue, as you said.  Meanwhile, the material the AP wanted to protect is still out there getting quoted in ways beyond the AP&#039;s control.  I suppose they could start to require the old media sites to not post AP articles on the internet, but good luck getting those sites to agree to that policy, which would be economic suicide for the old media, which is already struggling to compete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the AP is doing here is beyond idiotic.  It&#8217;s pretty clear that it&#8217;s being run by people who have no concept of how the internets and new media work.  In a way, I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;re happy about the &#8220;boycott,&#8221; since it is giving them exactly what they wanted.  What they don&#8217;t realize is that what they wanted will hurt them a heckuva lot more than it will help them, something that the blogosphere clearly realizes.  </p>
<p>And you&#8217;re right &#8211; it only takes about five minute for some other source to put up an AP story.  Assuming that source actually paid for the rights to the story (which is true if the source is any &#8220;old media&#8221; site), then the AP has no control whatsoever over what happens to the material once it&#8217;s placed on that source&#8217;s website.  Which means that the effect of the AP&#8217;s policy is just to ensure reduced traffic to its site and greater traffic to secondary party sites, thereby decreasing their own revenue, as you said.  Meanwhile, the material the AP wanted to protect is still out there getting quoted in ways beyond the AP&#8217;s control.  I suppose they could start to require the old media sites to not post AP articles on the internet, but good luck getting those sites to agree to that policy, which would be economic suicide for the old media, which is already struggling to compete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

