<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lawbreaking Is Now the Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/07/lawbreaking-is-now-the-law/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/07/lawbreaking-is-now-the-law</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:09:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/07/lawbreaking-is-now-the-law/comment-page-1#comment-39613</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/?p=4511#comment-39613</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;It wasn’t absolutely clear whether or not you view Obama as one of the betrayers of the Constitution.&lt;/i&gt;

Is that a question? If so, the answer is yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>It wasn’t absolutely clear whether or not you view Obama as one of the betrayers of the Constitution.</i></p>
<p>Is that a question? If so, the answer is yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/07/lawbreaking-is-now-the-law/comment-page-1#comment-39611</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 16:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/?p=4511#comment-39611</guid>
		<description>It wasn&#039;t absolutely clear whether or not you view Obama as one of the betrayers of the Constitution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wasn&#8217;t absolutely clear whether or not you view Obama as one of the betrayers of the Constitution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/07/lawbreaking-is-now-the-law/comment-page-1#comment-39610</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/?p=4511#comment-39610</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know the district number, but he&#039;s out of Princeton (in his previous life he was a nuclear physicist IIRC).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know the district number, but he&#8217;s out of Princeton (in his previous life he was a nuclear physicist IIRC).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/07/lawbreaking-is-now-the-law/comment-page-1#comment-39584</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 02:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/?p=4511#comment-39584</guid>
		<description>Mark,

I don&#039;t know a lot about Rush Holt. I&#039;ll have to fix that. Which district does he represent?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know a lot about Rush Holt. I&#8217;ll have to fix that. Which district does he represent?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Tedesco</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/07/lawbreaking-is-now-the-law/comment-page-1#comment-39581</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Tedesco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/?p=4511#comment-39581</guid>
		<description>For a very good review of the thing NOT mentioned in the debate over telecom immunity have a look at &lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/articles/culture/fisa-compromise.ars&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this article from ars technica&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a very good review of the thing NOT mentioned in the debate over telecom immunity have a look at <a href="http://arstechnica.com/articles/culture/fisa-compromise.ars" rel="nofollow">this article from ars technica</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chief</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/07/lawbreaking-is-now-the-law/comment-page-1#comment-39579</link>
		<dc:creator>Chief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 21:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/?p=4511#comment-39579</guid>
		<description>Last night on Countdown, Rachel Maddow was talking with Prof Jonathan Turley, a Constitutional Law professor about This colossal mistake.  I have a post up here with a transcript of last night&#039;s Countdown 
http://libertystreet.wordpress.com/2008/07/09/fisa-the-senate/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night on Countdown, Rachel Maddow was talking with Prof Jonathan Turley, a Constitutional Law professor about This colossal mistake.  I have a post up here with a transcript of last night&#8217;s Countdown<br />
<a href="http://libertystreet.wordpress.com/2008/07/09/fisa-the-senate/" rel="nofollow">http://libertystreet.wordpress.com/2008/07/09/fisa-the-senate/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/07/lawbreaking-is-now-the-law/comment-page-1#comment-39578</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 21:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/?p=4511#comment-39578</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t realize you were from NJ.  That gives me an excuse to launch into a brief comment on the role of NJ Dems in this entire issue.

I, likewise, was unusually happy to hear that both NJ senators voted the right way, even though I generally have a pretty low opinion of Lautenberg (I don&#039;t know enough about Menendez, though).  

I was far more proud of Rush Holt, though, who actually took a real leadership role in fighting for the Fourth Amendment, as sort of the House&#039;s version of Feingold - even though he&#039; s no longer my Congressman due to redistricting.  (The weird thing is that I hated him when he actually was my Congressman, if only because he unseated a guy I had interned with, thus contributing to the end of my one-time hopes of a career on Capitol Hill).  As much as I disagree with Holt on other things (libertarian that I am), he&#039;s easily one of the most principled politicians around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t realize you were from NJ.  That gives me an excuse to launch into a brief comment on the role of NJ Dems in this entire issue.</p>
<p>I, likewise, was unusually happy to hear that both NJ senators voted the right way, even though I generally have a pretty low opinion of Lautenberg (I don&#8217;t know enough about Menendez, though).  </p>
<p>I was far more proud of Rush Holt, though, who actually took a real leadership role in fighting for the Fourth Amendment, as sort of the House&#8217;s version of Feingold &#8211; even though he&#8217; s no longer my Congressman due to redistricting.  (The weird thing is that I hated him when he actually was my Congressman, if only because he unseated a guy I had interned with, thus contributing to the end of my one-time hopes of a career on Capitol Hill).  As much as I disagree with Holt on other things (libertarian that I am), he&#8217;s easily one of the most principled politicians around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
