In any event, the whole situation reeks of VC Andrews’ Garden of Shadows – you know, where you find out that Alicia hid in the attic until she gave birth to Corinne while Olivia faked being pregnant in the public eye.

The point here is that the drama has gotten to this level…and since it’s so untouchable (we’re so RUDE to question it, yet photos of Bristol and Sarah have mysteriously disappeared off the net, there’s no real info on the birth, and excuse me, but wouldn’t there be at least a SMALL story about a GOV.’s daughter staying home from school for months on end with mono??? Like a tiny story with pics about how she’s keeping up with her school work?? Anything??), we really have nothing to go on.

I think there are two possibilities:

1. No info is being provided because people obsessing over this ultimately sound nuts. At the same time, Sarah (and therefore the campaign) continue to be talked about – bad news is still news. If no one was talking about them, they wouldn’t have a chance, ya know?

2. Info is not being provided because there actually IS something to hide here.

I am not clear why Sarah isn’t coming forward and providing pics, etc. I mean, if she’s just a good ol’ gal from AK, why weren’t there any preggo pics by the fireside? (Seriously, Sarah, you’re parading that kid around like a poster boy, don’t tell me you believe your pregnancy and birth were really intimate and private.) Why no family adventure pics? (Really, aren’t you just a ‘regular Joe’? Wouldn’t you share a few ‘family outtings’ or whatever with Alaska?)

I think it’s pretty low class to bandy about your pro-life/no-sex-ed-in-schools/anti-BC platform and then pretend your family is is fighting the good fight as they overcome the problems that your platform supports! Does this sound crazy or what??!

Nothing about the truth behind this baby would shock me. Palin could have spawned and grew that baby in a test tube, made SURE it had a defect of some kind (nothing too debilitating, though – she can’t have a drooler in a wheelchair or a baby who had to have body casts or be on life support with her, it just wouldn’t ‘show’ as well), and had someone in Africa carry it to term. Would not shock me.

or if you have to “copy and paste:”
http://www.geocities.com/palinbabyquestion
http://www.palindeception.com

I’m Pullin’ For Palin – The Unofficial Tribute To Our Future VPILF
http://www.pullinforpalin.com/

While I have no moral stake in this baby claim, I do feel these questions you have raised have not been adequately addressed by the McCain campaign (or the media for that matter) and represent a severe “ethical” dilemma in which the personal situations of our leaders takes precedence over the common good through lies, manipulation and abuse of power.

For these reasons I would like to share with you some information I have uncovered below regarding the “birth announcement” of Trig Palin. Sarah Palin was said to have delivered baby Trig at the Mat Su Regional Hospital, which in turn has no on line record of Trig Palin for the date of April 18th, 2008. There are two simple explanations for this; either the hospital administrators deliberately omitted this information from their online record, or, the baby was never delivered at Mat Su Regional.

There was however a baby delivered to parents “Amber” and “Levi” on April 18th at Alaska Regional Hospital (see links below), a mere 45 min. drive from Wasilla.

http://www.alaskaregional.com/cpm/w-index.html
scroll down to the link on April 18th, 2008

http://www.newbabynews.net/hospitals/akr22/babies/images/h22-3127-med.jpg

Here is another AP link to Trig Palin with his grandparents……

http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/0eIA5qy1wt0Zw/340x.jpg

Striking resemblance? ……. I’ll let you be the judge…

While I recognize that this is a bit of a stretch and that ‘some of the names may have changed to protect the innocent’; it doesn’t seem any more far fetched than the “facts” which have emerged from the McCain campaign. How do we know Bristol Palin is 5 months pregnant instead of 5 months post partum? Because the McCain campaign told us so. To date no one has produced a single piece of compelling evidence to put this story to rest. If the initial story was untrue, all the McCain campaign would have had to produce is a single photo of Sarah Palin and her family celebrating the birth of their newest child in the delivery room (not during mind you….) or in the recovery ward. Surely, there is family documentation of this special event…. If she is so content to wear her motherhood on her sleeve, than why shy away from sharing a photo from an innocent moment that every family could relate to.

Would it not have been so much easier to squash the rumor that Bristol Palin was not the mother of Trig by producing such a photo? Instead, the McCain campaign created a shell game for a current scandal by dragging Bristol Palin (and the media) into a future one.

Either way, I personally think the family seems very interesting and “cool”, despite the fact that we greatly differ on religion, gay rights, “creationism”, etc….BUT I think people who are making an issue out of her religious ties are just as wrong as people who are making an issue about Obama’s Musilm ties and his own radically racist chuch.

I do hope eventually the truth about this comes out, though.