<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sarah Palin and the Fourth Estate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/09/sarah-palin-and-the-fourth-estate/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/09/sarah-palin-and-the-fourth-estate</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:39:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: karen marie</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/09/sarah-palin-and-the-fourth-estate/comment-page-1#comment-47592</link>
		<dc:creator>karen marie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 04:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/?p=4961#comment-47592</guid>
		<description>&quot;[Coinage of the phrase &quot;fourth estate,&quot;] with its present meaning, has been attributed to Edmund Burke (1729 - 1797), a British politician. It comes from a quote in Thomas Carlyle&#039;s book, &quot;Heros and Hero Worship in History&quot; (1841).

&quot;Burke said that there were three Estates in Parliament, but in the Reporters Gallery yonder, there sat a fourth Estate more important far than they all.&quot;

The three estates in the above quote refer to the British parliament, the Lords Temporal, the Lords Spiritual and the Commons. The Lords Temporal and the Lords Spiritual combined being The House of Lords, the upper House of parliament. And the Commons is The House of Commons or the British lower House. &quot;

http://www.campwood.com/FourthEstate.htm

none of the &quot;estates&quot; is religious -- you mistake the phrase &quot;lords spiritual.&quot;  And as Henry Fielding (1707 - 1754) points out in &quot;Covent Garden Journal,&quot;  the fourth estate is &quot;the mob.&quot;

&quot;None of our political writers..take notice of any more than three estates, namely, Kings, Lords, and Commons..passing by in silence that very large and powerful body which form the fourth estate in this community..The Mob&quot;

other than that, have at la palin with vigor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;[Coinage of the phrase "fourth estate,"] with its present meaning, has been attributed to Edmund Burke (1729 &#8211; 1797), a British politician. It comes from a quote in Thomas Carlyle&#8217;s book, &#8220;Heros and Hero Worship in History&#8221; (1841).</p>
<p>&#8220;Burke said that there were three Estates in Parliament, but in the Reporters Gallery yonder, there sat a fourth Estate more important far than they all.&#8221;</p>
<p>The three estates in the above quote refer to the British parliament, the Lords Temporal, the Lords Spiritual and the Commons. The Lords Temporal and the Lords Spiritual combined being The House of Lords, the upper House of parliament. And the Commons is The House of Commons or the British lower House. &#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.campwood.com/FourthEstate.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.campwood.com/FourthEstate.htm</a></p>
<p>none of the &#8220;estates&#8221; is religious &#8212; you mistake the phrase &#8220;lords spiritual.&#8221;  And as Henry Fielding (1707 &#8211; 1754) points out in &#8220;Covent Garden Journal,&#8221;  the fourth estate is &#8220;the mob.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;None of our political writers..take notice of any more than three estates, namely, Kings, Lords, and Commons..passing by in silence that very large and powerful body which form the fourth estate in this community..The Mob&#8221;</p>
<p>other than that, have at la palin with vigor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roschelle</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/09/sarah-palin-and-the-fourth-estate/comment-page-1#comment-42346</link>
		<dc:creator>roschelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 03:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/?p=4961#comment-42346</guid>
		<description>This whole thing is so bizarre to me. It&#039;s like being in a bad dream and not being able to wake up. Palin was virtually unknown outside of Alaska just ONE week ago. A woman, who in her own words &quot;wondered what it is a Vice President does all day&quot;. A woman who wants to deny women the right to terminate a pregnancy even if conception occurs as a result of rape or incest. 

Now, she&#039;s more popular than Obama or McCain. What does that say about the mindset of voters in this country. I&#039;ve heard people express how much they love her, her kids, even her parents...who&#039;ve only been shown on TV once at the RNC and have never uttered a word (as far as an interview goes) So what is it about her that has endeared her to so many people. 

The scandalous baggage that accompanies her nomination is as lengthy as the Bering Strait...yet she&#039;s almost revered by many woman and some men that have been interviewed since the announcement by McCain that she would be his running mate.

The &quot;maverick&quot; is looking more and more like a sidekick...merely going along with the powers that be...he says and does whatever he thinks his champions want to hear. Just like calling lobbyists &lt;a href=&quot;http://roschellenelson.blogspot.com/2008/09/birds-of-prey-may-be-coming-home-to.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&#039;birds of prey&#039;&lt;/a&gt; which is a total contradiction to what his true ties with these unnecessary evils in Washington are.

Come on America...are we so shallow that a pretty face is all it takes to win us over? Gov. Palin hasn&#039;t given not ONE interview outlining her plans for this country as VP since McCain picked her....only pre-written rhetoric aimed at tearing down the Democratic nominee and his party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This whole thing is so bizarre to me. It&#8217;s like being in a bad dream and not being able to wake up. Palin was virtually unknown outside of Alaska just ONE week ago. A woman, who in her own words &#8220;wondered what it is a Vice President does all day&#8221;. A woman who wants to deny women the right to terminate a pregnancy even if conception occurs as a result of rape or incest. </p>
<p>Now, she&#8217;s more popular than Obama or McCain. What does that say about the mindset of voters in this country. I&#8217;ve heard people express how much they love her, her kids, even her parents&#8230;who&#8217;ve only been shown on TV once at the RNC and have never uttered a word (as far as an interview goes) So what is it about her that has endeared her to so many people. </p>
<p>The scandalous baggage that accompanies her nomination is as lengthy as the Bering Strait&#8230;yet she&#8217;s almost revered by many woman and some men that have been interviewed since the announcement by McCain that she would be his running mate.</p>
<p>The &#8220;maverick&#8221; is looking more and more like a sidekick&#8230;merely going along with the powers that be&#8230;he says and does whatever he thinks his champions want to hear. Just like calling lobbyists <a href="http://roschellenelson.blogspot.com/2008/09/birds-of-prey-may-be-coming-home-to.html" rel="nofollow">&#8216;birds of prey&#8217;</a> which is a total contradiction to what his true ties with these unnecessary evils in Washington are.</p>
<p>Come on America&#8230;are we so shallow that a pretty face is all it takes to win us over? Gov. Palin hasn&#8217;t given not ONE interview outlining her plans for this country as VP since McCain picked her&#8230;.only pre-written rhetoric aimed at tearing down the Democratic nominee and his party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

