<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some Questions for Sarah Palin&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/09/some-questions-for-sarah-palin/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/09/some-questions-for-sarah-palin</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:11:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: GallFire</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/09/some-questions-for-sarah-palin/comment-page-1#comment-42198</link>
		<dc:creator>GallFire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 00:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/?p=4872#comment-42198</guid>
		<description>Indeed, that is what you meant.
BTW, considering it is currently legal - you do have to choose - so at this point in time that is the situation - but she doesn&#039;t believe there should even be a question - life every time. If it is because you have to choose, or you actually have the government protecting it is besides the point IMO.

But I do get what you are saying - a good catch ;)

@roschelle
It was scripted &#039;til about half way through, when the teleprompter got way ahead of her, and she had to wing it. Some of the more memorable lines of the night were not scripted at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, that is what you meant.<br />
BTW, considering it is currently legal &#8211; you do have to choose &#8211; so at this point in time that is the situation &#8211; but she doesn&#8217;t believe there should even be a question &#8211; life every time. If it is because you have to choose, or you actually have the government protecting it is besides the point IMO.</p>
<p>But I do get what you are saying &#8211; a good catch <img src='http://commentsfromleftfield.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>@roschelle<br />
It was scripted &#8217;til about half way through, when the teleprompter got way ahead of her, and she had to wing it. Some of the more memorable lines of the night were not scripted at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/09/some-questions-for-sarah-palin/comment-page-1#comment-42195</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 23:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/?p=4872#comment-42195</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I’m not sure at all what the first one is all about - choice is not ok for her daughter - assuming here you are referring to abortion…&lt;/i&gt;

When Sarah Palin made that public announcement that her 17-year-old daughter is pregnant (two days after her boss found out), she took pains to assure us that her daughter *chose* to &quot;keep the baby.* There&#039;s no choice if abortion is illegal, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I’m not sure at all what the first one is all about &#8211; choice is not ok for her daughter &#8211; assuming here you are referring to abortion…</i></p>
<p>When Sarah Palin made that public announcement that her 17-year-old daughter is pregnant (two days after her boss found out), she took pains to assure us that her daughter *chose* to &#8220;keep the baby.* There&#8217;s no choice if abortion is illegal, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roschelle</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/09/some-questions-for-sarah-palin/comment-page-1#comment-42189</link>
		<dc:creator>roschelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 23:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/?p=4872#comment-42189</guid>
		<description>She brought down the house as she smiled sheepishly into the cameras and read from the tele-prompter. It was a mediocre speech at best..but presented very well. Even so &lt;a href=&quot;http://roschellenelson.blogspot.com/2008/09/palins-speech-wasnt-all-bad.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I still don&#039;t know who Sarah Palin is!&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She brought down the house as she smiled sheepishly into the cameras and read from the tele-prompter. It was a mediocre speech at best..but presented very well. Even so <a href="http://roschellenelson.blogspot.com/2008/09/palins-speech-wasnt-all-bad.html" rel="nofollow">I still don&#8217;t know who Sarah Palin is!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GallFire</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/09/some-questions-for-sarah-palin/comment-page-1#comment-42180</link>
		<dc:creator>GallFire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 22:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/?p=4872#comment-42180</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure at all what the first one is all about - choice is not ok for her daughter - assuming here you are referring to abortion...

And, even though I am a Republican, I agree, she is way too flip-floppy on the bridge, and I can&#039;t figure out why they are saying she has foreign policy experience either - makes no sense.

The last one - the guy is a christian jew. Every christian thinks they are right and the Jews (and every other religion as well) are wrong - it&#039;s a religion.
And you know what - he wasn&#039;t saying to kill Jews, only that he felt they were wrong.
I strongly disagree, of course, as I am no longer christian, but converting to Judaism. But while I was a christian there was a messianic rabbi (christian Jew) who came ot my shurch talking about this - does that make me anti-Semitic?
Not to mention she did speak out against these views and stated that she does not agree with them.

On the memoirs but not laws, yeah, I have found a few he has introduced - not many, but there are a few. I don&#039;t put a lot of stock in &quot;sponsoring&quot; a bill though.

And about abandoning the inner city, well the same can be said that Democrats have abandoned the rural areas.

And I&#039;m not sure how to respond to the second one. Keeping a baby even when she knew it would have difficulties, and her daughter keeping her baby - even though it was conceived outside of wedlock - yes, that does speak to her pro-life stands - she&#039;s actually had to face that issue and met it head on and didn&#039;t waiver.
What I&#039;m not sure about is the statement that it is shameless for the press to question her own integrity and judgment.
That is perfectly reasonable, and should be questioned. What is &quot;off-limits&quot;, as Barack Obama said, is questioning her own integrity based on the mistakes of members of her family. They are their own people, and will make mistakes, but using those to attack Palin herself is shameless.
Questioning her own problems though, is perfectly fine.

So I agree, I would like to see some good solid answers on her Bridge to Nowhere flip, and on the idea she has foreign policy experience - if anyone is saying that they are mistaken.
Good post though, raises some good food for thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure at all what the first one is all about &#8211; choice is not ok for her daughter &#8211; assuming here you are referring to abortion&#8230;</p>
<p>And, even though I am a Republican, I agree, she is way too flip-floppy on the bridge, and I can&#8217;t figure out why they are saying she has foreign policy experience either &#8211; makes no sense.</p>
<p>The last one &#8211; the guy is a christian jew. Every christian thinks they are right and the Jews (and every other religion as well) are wrong &#8211; it&#8217;s a religion.<br />
And you know what &#8211; he wasn&#8217;t saying to kill Jews, only that he felt they were wrong.<br />
I strongly disagree, of course, as I am no longer christian, but converting to Judaism. But while I was a christian there was a messianic rabbi (christian Jew) who came ot my shurch talking about this &#8211; does that make me anti-Semitic?<br />
Not to mention she did speak out against these views and stated that she does not agree with them.</p>
<p>On the memoirs but not laws, yeah, I have found a few he has introduced &#8211; not many, but there are a few. I don&#8217;t put a lot of stock in &#8220;sponsoring&#8221; a bill though.</p>
<p>And about abandoning the inner city, well the same can be said that Democrats have abandoned the rural areas.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m not sure how to respond to the second one. Keeping a baby even when she knew it would have difficulties, and her daughter keeping her baby &#8211; even though it was conceived outside of wedlock &#8211; yes, that does speak to her pro-life stands &#8211; she&#8217;s actually had to face that issue and met it head on and didn&#8217;t waiver.<br />
What I&#8217;m not sure about is the statement that it is shameless for the press to question her own integrity and judgment.<br />
That is perfectly reasonable, and should be questioned. What is &#8220;off-limits&#8221;, as Barack Obama said, is questioning her own integrity based on the mistakes of members of her family. They are their own people, and will make mistakes, but using those to attack Palin herself is shameless.<br />
Questioning her own problems though, is perfectly fine.</p>
<p>So I agree, I would like to see some good solid answers on her Bridge to Nowhere flip, and on the idea she has foreign policy experience &#8211; if anyone is saying that they are mistaken.<br />
Good post though, raises some good food for thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
