<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Economic Foreboding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/12/more-economic-foreboding/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/12/more-economic-foreboding</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 10:28:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: December&#8217;s unemployment numbers are out&#8230; &#171; Talk Radio is Stupid</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/12/more-economic-foreboding/comment-page-1#comment-48708</link>
		<dc:creator>December&#8217;s unemployment numbers are out&#8230; &#171; Talk Radio is Stupid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 06:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/?p=6758#comment-48708</guid>
		<description>[...] whenever the numbers come out.  Since I haven&#8217;t visited the topic in a month, I need to remind everyone why job numbers from November or December are more important then the same numbers from, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] whenever the numbers come out.  Since I haven&#8217;t visited the topic in a month, I need to remind everyone why job numbers from November or December are more important then the same numbers from, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: December&#8217;s ememployment numbers are out&#8230; &#124; Comments from Left Field</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/12/more-economic-foreboding/comment-page-1#comment-48692</link>
		<dc:creator>December&#8217;s ememployment numbers are out&#8230; &#124; Comments from Left Field</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 16:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/?p=6758#comment-48692</guid>
		<description>[...] whenever the numbers come out.  Since I haven&#8217;t visited the topic in a month, I need to remind everyone why job numbers from November or December are more important then the same numbers from, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] whenever the numbers come out.  Since I haven&#8217;t visited the topic in a month, I need to remind everyone why job numbers from November or December are more important then the same numbers from, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/12/more-economic-foreboding/comment-page-1#comment-47757</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 19:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/?p=6758#comment-47757</guid>
		<description>LOL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tas</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/12/more-economic-foreboding/comment-page-1#comment-47750</link>
		<dc:creator>tas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 22:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/?p=6758#comment-47750</guid>
		<description>Hrm.  Reading it over again, Kathy, I think you&#039;re correct.  Now i have to change this post on three blogs.  Is this your way of giving somebody employment? ;&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hrm.  Reading it over again, Kathy, I think you&#8217;re correct.  Now i have to change this post on three blogs.  Is this your way of giving somebody employment? ;></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/12/more-economic-foreboding/comment-page-1#comment-47749</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 21:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/?p=6758#comment-47749</guid>
		<description>Tas, I think you mean it cannot be overstated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tas, I think you mean it cannot be overstated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tas</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/12/more-economic-foreboding/comment-page-1#comment-47748</link>
		<dc:creator>tas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 21:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/?p=6758#comment-47748</guid>
		<description>That and a stiff drink. 

If we use government money to spend on government infrastructure projects which need to get done anyway, we&#039;re at least killing two birds with one stone...  Then praying that the money generated via those new jobs will be enough to stimulate the economy over the cusp of recession.  If a massive infrastructure rebuilding problem (which would surely be coupled with tax breaks and interest rates dropping, thus increasing the amount of capital) fails, then we risk seeing inflation along with falling job numbers -- stagflation.  If that happens then shit has really hit the fan.

What worries me the most is how our economy has shifted from manufacturing to being service based.  How can we prime the pump at factories anymore if they are little factories to be had?  This is one reason why keeping the big three automakers afloat (and, I&#039;d postulate, passing a law banning them from moving manufacturing jobs outside the United States for at least 5 years) is so important (despite my political ideological feelings against bailing them out).  But would they be enough?  Or has so much of America&#039;s manufacturing sector slipped away that economy is in serious trouble because we are lacking in goods to sell?  In other words, I&#039;m wondering how much of a pump there is to prime right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That and a stiff drink. </p>
<p>If we use government money to spend on government infrastructure projects which need to get done anyway, we&#8217;re at least killing two birds with one stone&#8230;  Then praying that the money generated via those new jobs will be enough to stimulate the economy over the cusp of recession.  If a massive infrastructure rebuilding problem (which would surely be coupled with tax breaks and interest rates dropping, thus increasing the amount of capital) fails, then we risk seeing inflation along with falling job numbers &#8212; stagflation.  If that happens then shit has really hit the fan.</p>
<p>What worries me the most is how our economy has shifted from manufacturing to being service based.  How can we prime the pump at factories anymore if they are little factories to be had?  This is one reason why keeping the big three automakers afloat (and, I&#8217;d postulate, passing a law banning them from moving manufacturing jobs outside the United States for at least 5 years) is so important (despite my political ideological feelings against bailing them out).  But would they be enough?  Or has so much of America&#8217;s manufacturing sector slipped away that economy is in serious trouble because we are lacking in goods to sell?  In other words, I&#8217;m wondering how much of a pump there is to prime right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Macswain</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/12/more-economic-foreboding/comment-page-1#comment-47747</link>
		<dc:creator>Macswain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 21:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/?p=6758#comment-47747</guid>
		<description>Good point.

We need a massive infrastructure based stimulus package.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point.</p>
<p>We need a massive infrastructure based stimulus package.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

