Tunnel Vision

Sometimes, the sheer obtuseness of Israel supporters makes me want to scream until my vocal cords give out. This is Jeffrey Goldberg, opining about the possibility of peace between Hamas and Israel [go to BugMeNot for user id and password to avoid compulsory registration]:

As the Gaza war moves to a cease-fire, a crucial question will inevitably arise, as it has before: Should Israel (and by extension, the United States) try to engage Hamas in a substantive and sustained manner?

It is a fair question, one worth debating, but it is unmoored from certain political and theological realities. One irresistible reality grows from Hamas’s complicated, competitive relationship with Hezbollah. For Hamas, Hezbollah is not only a source of weapons and instruction, it is a mentor and role model.

Hamas’s desire to best Hezbollah’s achievements is natural, of course, but, more to the point, it is radicalizing. One of the reasons, among many, that Hamas felt compelled to break its cease-fire with Israel last month was to prove its potency to Muslims impressed with Hezbollah.

[…]Periodically, advocates of negotiation suggest that the hostility toward Jews expressed by Hamas is somehow mutable. But in years of listening, I haven’t heard much to suggest that its anti-Semitism is insincere. Like Hezbollah, Hamas believes that God is opposed to a Jewish state in Palestine. Both groups are rhetorically pitiless, though, again, Hamas sometimes appears to follow the lead of Hezbollah.

Goldberg refers to a question he asked Nizar Rayyan — the Hamas leader recently killed by the IDF — in a 2006 interview:

I asked him the question I always ask of Hamas leaders: Could you agree to anything more than a tactical cease-fire with Israel? I felt slightly ridiculous asking: A man who believes that God every now and again transforms Jews into pigs and apes might not be the most obvious candidate for peace talks at Camp David. Mr. Rayyan answered the question as I thought he would, saying that a long-term cease-fire would be unnecessary, because it will not take long for the forces of Islam to eradicate Israel.

There is a fixed idea among some Israeli leaders that Hamas can be bombed into moderation. This is a false and dangerous notion. It is true that Hamas can be deterred militarily for a time, but tanks cannot defeat deeply felt belief.

The reverse is also true: Hamas cannot be cajoled into moderation. Neither position credits Hamas with sincerity, or seriousness.

The only small chance for peace today is the same chance that existed before the Gaza invasion: The moderate Arab states, Europe, the United States and, mainly, Israel, must help Hamas’s enemy, Fatah, prepare the West Bank for real freedom, and then hope that the people of Gaza, vast numbers of whom are unsympathetic to Hamas, see the West Bank as an alternative to the squalid vision of Hassan Nasrallah and Nizar Rayyan.

Where to begin? As usual, one villain gets singled out as the cause of the entire conflict, and the sole reason why peace is not possible. Today, it’s Hamas. Yesterday, it was the Palestine Liberation Organization and Yasir Arafat. If Hamas disappeared tomorrow, Fatah or some other group would undoubtedly take its place, because the real issue isn’t the ruthlessness or anti-semitism of Hamas leaders — it’s the conditions in which Palestinians live, and it’s the assumption in Israel and among Israel’s supporters that a “good” or “appropriate” negotiating partner is one who effectively represents Israel’s interests among Palestinians as opposed to one who advocates for Palestinian interests.

There is no question that anti-semitism is virulent and rampant within Hamas, as well as in Hezbollah and its state patron, Iran. That does not necessarily mean that most Palestinians hate Jews as opposed to hating Israel and its policies toward them, or that the majority of Palestinians would not be willing to accept Israel’s right to exist in peace and security within its own borders if Palestinians’ right to retain what is rightfully theirs and to exist peacefully and safely within the legitimate borders of their own state with ownership and control over their own natural resources were equally respected. The hatred for Jews within organizations like Hamas only matters to the extent it’s accepted among Palestinians as a whole. And Palestinians as a whole are not likely to hate Jews when they can see with their own eyes and in their own lives that the Jewish leaders of the Jewish state don’t hate them.

Goldberg does not seem to get this point. When he writes that Israel and the United States and the “moderate” Arab states must “help Fatah prepare the West Bank for freedom,” in the hope that Palestinians in Gaza will come to “see the West Bank as an alternative to the squalid vision of Hassan Nasrallah and Nizar Rayyan,” he misses the fact that this “alternative” is the status quo, take it or leave it. The reality that Palestinians in Gaza chose Hamas over Fatah because Fatah was not effectively advocating for Palestinian interests is ignored. Palestinians did not vote Hamas into office because they prefer “squalor” to “the alternative.” They voted Hamas into office because their lives are unbearable under the conditions Israel has imposed — and Fatah, in their view, was not doing enough to change that.

As just one example, when Goldberg touts the West Bank as “an alternative” to the “squalid vision” of Hamas’s leaders, he forgets that Israel’s so-called “security” wall is part of that “alternative.” He forgets — or probably more likely he never knew — that the purpose of the wall is not security at all but rather the folding in of over 100 Jewish settlements; the permanent annexation of Palestinian land, “walling Palestinian farmers off from their olive trees” and crops; and the literal, physical barricading of hundreds of Palestinians inside a no man’s land between the wall and the Green Line from which if they want to tend their land, they will need permission to leave their homes and pass through special gates into the West Bank. [Full disclosure: The Green Planet Monitor website was created by my brother, Dave Kattenburg.]

That reality is the “freedom” for which Israel wants Fatah to prepare Palestinians — a “freedom” in which their borders, natural resources, and freedom of movement are controlled by a draconian security apparatus that is designed, not to protect the physical safety of Israelis or Palestinians, but to establish an apartheid system under which Israelis are privileged and Palestinians are left subjugated and powerless.

Palestinians are not likely to accept such an arrangement. Which is why the Israeli government’s attempt at triangulation and its desire for veto power over who gets to be the “legitimate” representative of the Palestinian people won’t work. Whatever terms one might use to characterize Israel and the United States refusing to negotiate with or accept the democratically elected representatives of Palestinians in Gaza and turning to some other group as the “legitimate” leaders, it’s not freedom or democracy.

2 Responses to “Tunnel Vision”

  1. Jmo53 says:

    I agree that Israel’s decision to continue building settlements in the west bank is an obsticle to peace. That said, I do not accept the premise that Palistinians voted for Hamas because they believed that Fatah was not doing enough to free them from the hell they live in and Hamas would.

    Rather I believe that they majority of Palistinians are not ready to free themselves of the hope that someday they can defeat Israel and return to a state that they totally control and where the Jews have gone elsewhere. Generations of Palistinians have been schooled on this idea and so they see their suffering as a down payment (investment) in an ultimate victory.

    That is why Araft did not take the great deal offered to him and why each time we get close to a peaceful settlement we have a palistinians uprising. Arafat did not take the deal because he couldn’t . Had he done so he would have been assasinated.

    Truth be told there was never stong support for peace within the Palistinians community only moving towards peace in ways that would limit their misery, but no final deal. Because making the final deal would require them to give up the dream.

    There was a time in Israel when many believed they could defeat the Palistinains and that they would simply melt back into the rest of arab society and Isreal could expand its borders. Few believe that anymore. Israel is ready for peace.

    Palistinains are not ready for peace, when they sit down at the dinner table they don’t think about two state solutions and peaceful co-existence. Their writers and thinkers are not discussing those options and their professors in the diaspora are not taking about a time when a Palsitinians state and the of Israel will co-exist. Until that begins to happen there will be no peace.

    The quandry for Israel is whether peace is best achieved by tightening or loosening the control over the live of Palsitinains. That is the debate in Israelie society. Sadly, I believe that the debate in Palistinian society centers around whether it is better to particpate in the peace process as a tactic in the war of liberation or to reject that peace process.?

  2. Kathy says:

    Rather I believe that they majority of Palistinians are not ready to free themselves of the hope that someday they can defeat Israel and return to a state that they totally control and where the Jews have gone elsewhere. Generations of Palistinians have been schooled on this idea and so they see their suffering as a down payment (investment) in an ultimate victory.

    Yes, that’s what happens when four generations of stateless refugees exist in dreadful conditions under foreign military occupation. No present-day hope is being offered them, so they live with the memory of a terrible injustice and the fantastic hope passed down to them from the generation that lost everything in 1948 to the next, and the next, and the next. Three generations of Palestinians who can’t remember and have never known any other existence but refugee camps and occupation have grown up with the original generation’s pain, anger, and dreams — because they have been given nothing else.

    So when you write that “the majority of Palistinians are not ready to free themselves of the hope that someday they can defeat Israel and return to a state that they totally control and where the Jews have gone elsewhere,” my question to you is: What positive motivation or realistic possibility have they been given by the state of Israel to free themselves of that hope? What alternate vision has Israel committed to, that it can offer Palestinians in place of that hope?

    Until that question can be answered in a productive way, nothing will change.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Weekend Opinionator: The Battle Over the Battle in Gaza - The Opinionator Blog - NYTimes.com - [...] military service, to an insistence that the entire Israeli security apparatus is designed “not to protect the physical safety…
  2. Department of Shameless Self-Promotion « Liberty Street - [...] (Go here for user id and password.)  One of the posts they link to is mine. It’s at my…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Connect with Facebook