<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Carrying GOP water?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2009/02/carrying-gop-water/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2009/02/carrying-gop-water</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 10:28:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve M.</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2009/02/carrying-gop-water/comment-page-1#comment-49794</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/?p=7873#comment-49794</guid>
		<description>But I believe the reduction of the value of itemized deductions for upper-bracket people is new, and is in addition to the reversion to the Clinton-era top tax rate of 39.6%.  The latter is a reversal of the Bush tax cuts; the former, I think, isn&#039;t.  (Not that I object to either, by any means.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But I believe the reduction of the value of itemized deductions for upper-bracket people is new, and is in addition to the reversion to the Clinton-era top tax rate of 39.6%.  The latter is a reversal of the Bush tax cuts; the former, I think, isn&#8217;t.  (Not that I object to either, by any means.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

