<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forget nationalizing banks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2009/02/forget-nationalizing-banks/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2009/02/forget-nationalizing-banks</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:11:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2009/02/forget-nationalizing-banks/comment-page-1#comment-49617</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/?p=7791#comment-49617</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Also not sure why everyone complains about job losses - the way I see it, cuts are inevitable given this economy (Honda, Toyota, BMW and Nissan are doing it too), and you either cut some jobs or cut them all.&lt;/i&gt;

Has your job been cut?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Also not sure why everyone complains about job losses &#8211; the way I see it, cuts are inevitable given this economy (Honda, Toyota, BMW and Nissan are doing it too), and you either cut some jobs or cut them all.</i></p>
<p>Has your job been cut?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rawdawgbuffalo</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2009/02/forget-nationalizing-banks/comment-page-1#comment-49615</link>
		<dc:creator>rawdawgbuffalo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/?p=7791#comment-49615</guid>
		<description>boy, credit is &lt;a href=&#039;http://rawdawgb.blogspot.com/2009/02/cracks-evil-twin.html&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Crack&#8217;s evil twin&lt;/a&gt;
and they still gone let go 50,000 workers (auto folks)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>boy, credit is <a href='http://rawdawgb.blogspot.com/2009/02/cracks-evil-twin.html' rel="nofollow">Crack&#8217;s evil twin</a><br />
and they still gone let go 50,000 workers (auto folks)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tas</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2009/02/forget-nationalizing-banks/comment-page-1#comment-49613</link>
		<dc:creator>tas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/?p=7791#comment-49613</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;GM isn’t asking for $100 billion. That’s an estimate of what debtor-in-possession financing would cost the government were the company to go through a bankruptcy. I think they were required to present a bankruptcy scenario as part of their progress reports.&lt;/i&gt;

Some people would regard this as a threat -- if you don&#039;t give us $XX billions now, we&#039;ll come back for $XXX billions later. 

&lt;i&gt;Also not sure why everyone complains about job losses - the way I see it, cuts are inevitable given this economy (Honda, Toyota, BMW and Nissan are doing it too), and you either cut some jobs or cut them all.&lt;/i&gt;

Because usually the deal works like this: if you give us $XX billions, we&#039;ll keep XX,XXX jobs.  But now GM is saying eh, just give us the money.  Do we even know what they&#039;re going to use this money for?  Have they presented a business model that shows why the money is needed and where it&#039;s going?  Do they have a plan?  I&#039;m sick of the lack of accountability.  If we give GM the money at this point, then I right the government should fire GM&#039;s management and go in there with their own management crew since the current head honchos at GM obviously don&#039;t know what they&#039;re doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>GM isn’t asking for $100 billion. That’s an estimate of what debtor-in-possession financing would cost the government were the company to go through a bankruptcy. I think they were required to present a bankruptcy scenario as part of their progress reports.</i></p>
<p>Some people would regard this as a threat &#8212; if you don&#8217;t give us $XX billions now, we&#8217;ll come back for $XXX billions later. </p>
<p><i>Also not sure why everyone complains about job losses &#8211; the way I see it, cuts are inevitable given this economy (Honda, Toyota, BMW and Nissan are doing it too), and you either cut some jobs or cut them all.</i></p>
<p>Because usually the deal works like this: if you give us $XX billions, we&#8217;ll keep XX,XXX jobs.  But now GM is saying eh, just give us the money.  Do we even know what they&#8217;re going to use this money for?  Have they presented a business model that shows why the money is needed and where it&#8217;s going?  Do they have a plan?  I&#8217;m sick of the lack of accountability.  If we give GM the money at this point, then I right the government should fire GM&#8217;s management and go in there with their own management crew since the current head honchos at GM obviously don&#8217;t know what they&#8217;re doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: downing street memo</title>
		<link>http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2009/02/forget-nationalizing-banks/comment-page-1#comment-49610</link>
		<dc:creator>downing street memo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentsfromleftfield.com/?p=7791#comment-49610</guid>
		<description>GM isn&#039;t asking for $100 billion. That&#039;s an estimate of what debtor-in-possession financing would cost the government were the company to go through a bankruptcy. I think they were required to present a bankruptcy scenario as part of their progress reports. 

Also not sure why everyone complains about job losses - the way I see it, cuts are inevitable given this economy (Honda, Toyota, BMW and Nissan are doing it too), and you either cut some jobs or cut them all. Clearly, the better outcome for the overall economy, especially for a major employer like GM, is the former.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM isn&#8217;t asking for $100 billion. That&#8217;s an estimate of what debtor-in-possession financing would cost the government were the company to go through a bankruptcy. I think they were required to present a bankruptcy scenario as part of their progress reports. </p>
<p>Also not sure why everyone complains about job losses &#8211; the way I see it, cuts are inevitable given this economy (Honda, Toyota, BMW and Nissan are doing it too), and you either cut some jobs or cut them all. Clearly, the better outcome for the overall economy, especially for a major employer like GM, is the former.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
