The Fix Is In

Barack Obama has made his decision:

  • Four DOJ memos will be released, unredacted except for the names of the CIA interrogators who carried out the torture.
  • CIA personnel who tortured detainees using, among other techniques, the partial drowning method called “waterboarding” have been granted immunity from prosecution.
  • Spain has somehow been persuaded not to proceed with the charges of war crimes against six high-ranking Bush officials, including Alberto Gonzales, John Yoo, David Addington, and William Haynes III.

Mark Mazzetti posts the link to all four documents (I haven’t seen or read them yet).

Marc Ambinder has Pres. Obama’s full statement explaining his decision. Here it is again, in its entirety (emphasis mine):

The Department of Justice will today release certain memos issued by the Office of Legal Counsel between 2002 and 2005 as part of an ongoing court case. These memos speak to techniques that were used in the interrogation of terrorism suspects during that period, and their release is required by the rule of law.

My judgment on the content of these memos is a matter of record. In one of my very first acts as President, I prohibited the use of these interrogation techniques by the United States because they undermine our moral authority and do not make us safer. Enlisting our values in the protection of our people makes us stronger and more secure. A democracy as resilient as ours must reject the false choice between our security and our ideals, and that is why these methods of interrogation are already a thing of the past.

But that is not what compelled the release of these legal documents today. While I believe strongly in transparency and accountability, I also believe that in a dangerous world, the United States must sometimes carry out intelligence operations and protect information that is classified for purposes of national security. I have already fought for that principle in court and will do so again in the future. However, after consulting with the Attorney General, the Director of National Intelligence, and others, I believe that exceptional circumstances surround these memos and require their release.

First, the interrogation techniques described in these memos have already been widely reported. Second, the previous Administration publicly acknowledged portions of the program – and some of the practices – associated with these memos. Third, I have already ended the techniques described in the memos through an Executive Order. Therefore, withholding these memos would only serve to deny facts that have been in the public domain for some time. This could contribute to an inaccurate accounting of the past, and fuel erroneous and inflammatory assumptions about actions taken by the United States.

In releasing these memos, it is our intention to assure those who carried out their duties relying in good faith upon legal advice from the Department of Justice that they will not be subject to prosecution. The men and women of our intelligence community serve courageously on the front lines of a dangerous world. Their accomplishments are unsung and their names unknown, but because of their sacrifices, every single American is safer. We must protect their identities as vigilantly as they protect our security, and we must provide them with the confidence that they can do their jobs.

Going forward, it is my strong belief that the United States has a solemn duty to vigorously maintain the classified nature of certain activities and information related to national security. This is an extraordinarily important responsibility of the presidency, and it is one that I will carry out assertively irrespective of any political concern. Consequently, the exceptional circumstances surrounding these memos should not be viewed as an erosion of the strong legal basis for maintaining the classified nature of secret activities. I will always do whatever is necessary to protect the national security of the United States.

This is a time for reflection, not retribution
. I respect the strong views and emotions that these issues evoke. We have been through a dark and painful chapter in our history. But at a time of great challenges and disturbing disunity, nothing will be gained by spending our time and energy laying blame for the past. Our national greatness is embedded in America’s ability to right its course in concert with our core values, and to move forward with confidence. That is why we must resist the forces that divide us, and instead come together on behalf of our common future.

The United States is a nation of laws. My Administration will always act in accordance with those laws, and with an unshakeable commitment to our ideals. That is why we have released these memos, and that is why we have taken steps to ensure that the actions described within them never take place again.

I was not aware that enforcing the law was a matter of “retribution.” Being a “nation of laws” means nothing if people who break those laws are not held accountable. I’m not talking about the CIA interrogators. Perhaps the argument that they were acting in a good faith belief that their actions were legal is strong enough to justify immunizing them from prosecution. But the same is not true of the lawyers who wrote these twisted, perverted, atrociously reasoned memos. Nor is it true of the highest-ranking officials in our government — the president, the vice-president, the secretary of defense, and others — who told the lawyers to give them the legal cover they needed to design, carry out, and maintain their regime of torture.

I am very pleased and relieved that the four memos are being released with no substantive details censored. But that does not change the fact that the people who authorized and justified the horrors those memos document have today been sent the clear message that they will not be criminally investigated or prosecuted for their acts.

4 Responses to “The Fix Is In”

  1. This decision is Obama’s worst yet. My question is: OK, so you won’t prosecute those who carried out torture, does that mean you also won’t prosecute those who ordered it, allowed it? I haven’t really hard this discussed in the news coverage of the issue yet.

  2. Kathy says:

    I actually think he left the door open for that.

  3. trampling grapes says:

    “In releasing these memos, it is our intention to assure those who carried out their duties relying in good faith upon legal advice from the Department of Justice that they will not be subject to prosecution. ”
    Recall, if you will, that President Obama regards Abraham Lincoln as the paragon of leadership. And recall, if you will, that Mr. Lincoln was quite probably the best politician this country has produced. His slow, subtle unveiling to the public of emancipation took nearly two years. During that time his patience while he labored to swing public opinion to his side was, really, miraculous in retrospect.
    IF – and I say IF – Obama intends to follow Lincoln’s path, with the idea that he will watch and sway public opinion before he proceeds – then he is certainly following in fine footsteps indeed.
    Present the facts, wait and see how the public reacts, and start persuading.

    This issue of torture should be sublimated to the far larger atrocity of the aggressive war that was waged in 2003 – but it raises precisely the same issues. Shall we hold the soldiers accountable for invading a soveriegn country that was never a threat to our national security? I can’t imagine it. But certainly the people that *ordered* an aggressive war, based on lies, MUST be held accountable. The 2002 Downing Memo clearly shows the White House planning the lies they would use to justify the attack on Iraq.

    Putin understood bush’s dilemma perfectly when he invaded Georgia. How could the U.S. government accuse him of waging war, he said, when the U.S. had done the exact same thing in Iraq? And bush looked like he had been slapped, and dropped the subject.

    It is almost unimaginable that a country would accuse in court its own leaders of war crimes. But it is most imaginably noble that the United States WILL investigate all these outrages and, if called for, prosecute anyone guilty of torture, war profiteering and aggressive war.

    We must do this as a country if we are to hold our heads up in pride.

  4. Kathy says:

    Great comment, tramplinggrapes. Well said.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Connect with Facebook