Overview
In April 2011, ZDNet’s editors published a post by David Gewirtz on the ZDNet Government Blog, which typically covers cybersecurity and related policy topics. The post was titled “Hillary Clinton’s Strategic Mistake (and Barack Obama’s Brilliant Move).” It represented an instance where a technology commentator engaged in political analysis.
Author Background
David Gewirtz is known for his work in technology and cybersecurity. His background includes professional roles such as:
- Executive Director of the U.S. Strategic Perspective Institute, a nonprofit research and policy organization
- Cyberterrorism Advisor for the International Association for Counterterrorism and Security Professionals
- Columnist for The Journal of Counterterrorism and Homeland Security
- Contributor to Frontline Security Magazine
Gewirtz has appeared on several television and radio outlets, including CNN, Fox News, ABC, NBC, National Public Radio, Voice of America, and Radio Free Europe. He is also affiliated with the FBI’s InfraGard program, the U.S. Naval Institute, and the National Defense Industrial Association.
Summary of the Post
In “Hillary Clinton’s Strategic Mistake (and Barack Obama’s Brilliant Move),” Gewirtz examined political decisions made during the early years of the Obama administration. The article referred to the Affordable Care Act and Hillary Clinton’s role within the administration. Gewirtz also raised questions about the outcomes of these political choices and compared potential alternative scenarios.
Public Discussion
The post generated attention due to its blend of political and technological commentary. Readers noted that it was uncommon for a writer primarily focused on technology policy to address partisan political topics within a technology publication. The discussion highlighted broader questions about the intersection of journalism, expertise, and opinion in digital media spaces.
Media Context
The incident illustrates how specialized bloggers occasionally expand into political or social commentary, reflecting the increasingly blurred boundaries between technology reporting and political analysis. It also demonstrates how professional background can influence the framing and reception of political discussions in online publications.